Guide
What Does 'Standard of Care' Mean in a Malpractice Case?
The legal concept at the center of every medical malpractice claim
Nearly every medical malpractice case turns on one central question: did the provider meet the standard of care? Understanding what that phrase actually means is key to understanding your situation.
- Standard of care is generally defined as the level of skill, care, and treatment that a reasonably competent provider in the same field would have provided under similar circumstances
- It is not a guarantee of a good outcome -- providers aren't liable simply because treatment didn't work
- It's typically established through expert testimony from other medical professionals in the same specialty
- Standards can vary somewhat by circumstances, such as available resources or the urgency of the situation
- A breach of the standard of care must also be shown to have caused your harm -- proving one without the other usually isn't enough
Because standard of care is a specialized medical and legal question, it's evaluated by qualified experts, not by patients or even attorneys working alone. This is why nearly every legitimate malpractice claim involves a medical expert review early in the process.
This article provides general information only, not legal or medical advice. Medical malpractice claims are highly fact-specific and state-law-dependent. Using this site doesn't create an attorney-client relationship -- a licensed attorney in your state, usually working with a qualified medical expert, is the only way to evaluate your specific situation.
Related reading